风景园林中的设计实践与研究：从概念的再定位到三条可行路径

Integrating Design Praxis and Research in Landscape Architecture: From Redefining Concept to Discussing Three Possible Pathways

摘要:

为重拾对风景园林“设计实践（Design praxis）”的全面理解，纠正将实践狭义地等同于技术劳动的常见误解，以概念解读与案例剖析为研究方法，将设计实践重新界定为“行动- 反思- 再行动”的动态循环，探讨研究与实践在风景园林学科中的融合路径，并将其总结为3 类：在设计实践中进行研究（Research through Design Praxis）、研究设计实践方法论（Design Praxis Method Research）以及对设计实践的研究（Research of Design Praxis）。研究发现，路径一通过跨学科研究与设计的深度嵌合，将项目作为实验平台以积累可量化、可共享的知识；路径二强调推动设计工具、协作流程及决策逻辑的系统化与创新；路径三则立足于学科的强实践性，通过对项目的综合剖析提炼理论与设计逻辑。3 类路径在实际操作中并非彼此割裂，而是在项目研究、方法创新与经验总结中相互交叠，并需依托开放协同的平台建设持续推动学科知识生产。

Abstract:

This study aims to restore a comprehensive understanding of 'design praxis' in landscape architecture and to correct the common misconception that practice is narrowly equivalent to technical labor. Using conceptual interpretation and case analysis as research methods, this paper redefines design praxis as a dynamic cycle of 'action–reflection–re-action', explores the pathways through which research and practice are integrated within the discipline of landscape architecture, and summarizes them into three categories: Research through Design Praxis, Design Praxis Method Research, and Research of Design Praxis. The findings indicate that Path I embeds interdisciplinary research deeply into design, using projects as experimental platforms to accumulate measurable and shareable knowledge; Path II emphasizes the systematization and innovation of design tools, collaborative processes, and decision-making logics; and Path III, grounded in the discipline's strong practical orientation, extracts theories and design rationales through comprehensive analyses of projects. The discussion suggests that the three pathways are not isolated from one another in actual operation, but overlap across project-based research, methodological innovation, and experience synthesis, and require open and collaborative platform-building to continuously advance disciplinary knowledge production.