基于AHP-FCE模型的滇越铁路遗产型乡镇景观评价与优化
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

昆明理工大学建筑与城市规划学院

作者简介:

车震宇/1971 年生/ 男/ 云南玉溪人/ 博士/ 昆明理工大学建筑与城市规划学院(昆明 650500)/ 教授、博士生导师/ 研究方向城乡聚落保护发展、乡土建筑与遗产保护

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU986

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“跨国文化线路视野下滇越铁路乡村站点聚落的形态基因与活化利用研究”(编号:52268005)


Landscape Evaluation and Optimization of Heritage Towns along the Yunnan-Vietnam Railway Based on the AHP-FCE Model
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    滇越铁路是云南重要的线性文化遗产,见证了云南现代化的进程,站点仍保留了大量的铁路遗存。通过实地走访调查,以滇越铁路7 个铁路遗产型乡镇为研究对象,采用德尔菲法、层次分析法和模糊综合评价法,构建滇越铁路遗产型乡镇景观价值评价体系,计算各层级评价指标的综合得分。研究表明,滇越铁路7 个铁路遗产型乡镇的景观质量处于中上水平,其中盘溪镇(盘溪站)、草坝镇(草坝站)和芷村镇(芷村站)的评价等级均为Ⅱ级,景观条件良好;狗街镇(狗街子站)、巡检司镇(巡检司站)、白河镇(白鹤桥站)和南溪镇(南溪站)的评价等级均为Ⅲ级,景观条件一般。根据各乡镇景观的优劣势,提出有针对性的站点、自然、聚落、农业、人文景观优化策略。

    Abstract:

    The Yunnan-Vietnam Railway is a significant linear cultural heritage site in Yunnan Province,serving as a historical testament to the region's modernization process. Despite overa century of development, numerous railway-related relics remain preserved in townsalong the route. This study selects seven railway heritage-type towns along the Yunnan-Vietnam Railway as research subjects through field investigations. By integrating theDelphi method, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Fuzzy Comprehensive EvaluationMethod, a comprehensive landscape value assessment framework for these heritagetowns is established. The weights of evaluation indicators are determined through expertconsultation and hierarchical analysis, and the integrated scores at each level are calculatedaccordingly. Results indicate that the overall landscape quality of the seven towns is at amedium-to-high level. Specifically, Panxi Town (Panxi Station), Caoba Town (Caoba Station),and Zhicun Town (Zhicun Station) are classified as Grade II, reflecting favorable landscapeconditions; while Goujie Town (Goujiezi Station), Xunjiansi Town (Xunjiansi Station), BaiheTown (Baiheqiao Station), and Nanxi Town (Nanxi Station) are categorized as Grade III,indicating moderate landscape quality. Based on an analysis of the respective strengthsand limitations in landscape characteristics, targeted optimisation strategies have beenproposed for sites, natural features, settlements, agriculture, and cultural landscapes.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-28
  • 最后修改日期:2025-10-12
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-03-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码