基于自然保护地空间管控分区的生态服务价值精细化评估模型
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

广州大学建筑与城市规划学院,广州大学国家公园研究中心

作者简介:

宋啸 /1995 年生 / 女 / 河南济源人 / 广州大学建筑与城市规划学院,广州大学国家公园研究中心(广州 510006)/ 在读硕士研究生 / 专业方向为自然保护地规划

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU986

基金项目:

广东省林业局《南岭国家公园生态廊道体系研究与建设方案编制》(编号:199001)


A Refined Assessment Model of Ecological Service Value Based on Spatial Control Zoning of Protected Areas
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    生态服务价值评估被广泛应用于自然保护地的规划管理中,探索与生态空间管控相关联的精细化评估方法具有重要意义。针对常规当量法生态价值评估模型计算方法复杂、结果粗略的不足,以南岭国家公园为例进行方法优化和精细化评估模型建构:基于生态空间管控分区,以森林质量关 键性评价指标——蓄积量为链接,通过关联性分析识别蓄积量与生态服务价值、管控单元得分之间的回归关系,构建与管控单元相结合的生态服务价值精细化评估模型。通过对比验证,2 种模型计算结果高度一致,占总面积 97.81% 的小班差值低于 5%;在差值大于 10% 的区间中,84%的小班面积小于 1 hm2,表明 2 种模型的差值主要集中在小面积区域,而研究提出的模型弥补了当量法小面积价值趋于 0 的不足,结果更准确。

    Abstract:

    Ecological service value assessment has been widely used in the planning and management of protected areas, and it is of great significance to explore the refined assessment methods related to ecological space management and control. The conventional equivalent method to calculate the ecological service value assessment model has shortcomings, such as complicated calculation processes and rough results. Taking Nanling National Park as an example, the method optimization and refined assessment model construction were carried out. Based on the ecological space management and control unit, the regression relationship between the forest stock and the value of ecological services and the scores of management and control units was identified by the correlation analysis method with the key evaluation index of forest quality -- stand volume as the link, so as to build a refined assessment model of ecological service value combined with the management and control units. Through comparison and verification, the calculation results of the two models are highly consistent, accounting for 97.81% of the total area of the slight class difference is less than 5%. In the interval where the difference is more significant than 10%, 84% of the small class area is less than 1 hm2, which indicates that the difference between the two models is mainly concentrated in the small area class. The proposed model makes up for the deficiency of the equivalent method in that the value of ecological services of small area units tends to 0 and makes the calculation result more accurate.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-17
  • 最后修改日期:2024-07-31
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-06
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码