广州市装配式立体绿化景观综合评价分析*
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

广东省冶金建筑设计研究院有限公司

作者简介:

明丽红 /1994 年生 / 女 / 湖北黄石人 / 硕士研究生 / 广东 省冶金建筑设计研究院有限公司(广州 510095)/ 专业方向为园林植物与城市绿化

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU986

基金项目:

广州市林业和园林局科技项目(2018-06):广州市森林碳汇成效监测


Comprehensive Evaluation of Prefabricated Three-dimensional Greening in Guangzhou
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于对广州市越秀、天河、荔湾和海珠 4 个老城区立体绿化景观现状与生长情况调研,从生态效益、景观美学、抗逆能力、景观成本 4 个方面构建广州市立体绿化景观综合评价体系,运用层次分析法(AHP)对 22 个装配式立体绿化景观样点进行评价。结果表明,4 个准则层要素中生态效益权重值最大(0.299 1),抗逆能力权重值最小(0.211 6);评价结果为Ⅰ级的景观样点 8 个,Ⅱ级的 14 个;景观评价最高的 3 个立体绿化景观样点是 P7、P19、P22,最低的是 P5、P8、P1,建议推广应用“3 种及以上植物 + 不同叶色植物 + 不同叶形植物”的得分较高的设计模式。

    Abstract:

    Based on the status investigation of application and growth on three-dimensional greening in four old urban districts in Guangzhou, Yuexiu District, Tianhe District, Liwan District, and Haizhu District, a comprehensive evaluation system of three-dimensional greening in Guangzhou is built from the aspects of ecological benefit, landscape aesthetic, resistance capacity and landscape cost, and 22 prefabricated three-dimensional greening landscape sample points are evaluated by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). The results show that among the four criterion-level elements, the ecological benefit has the largest weight (0.299 1), while the resistance capacity has the smallest weight (0.211 6). And 8 sample points are rated as Grade I, and 14 are rated as Grade II. Among them, the 3 sample points with the highest landscape evaluation are P7, P19, and P22, and the lowest are P5, P8, and P1. It is recommended to popularize and apply the higher score design patterns of “3 or more plant species + plants with different leaf colors + plants with different leaf shapes”.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-02
  • 最后修改日期:2021-05-26
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-03-01
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码